The ArbitrumDAO community has taken a significant step toward greater transparency with the release of its first Governance Analytics Report, offering a detailed look at key governance metrics and community engagement trends for November 2024. This report serves as a foundational tool for understanding participation dynamics, delegate behavior, and voting outcomes—all critical components of a healthy decentralized governance ecosystem.
By analyzing onchain and offchain data, we uncover patterns that reflect both progress and persistent challenges in community involvement. While several proposals advanced successfully, underlying trends point to a need for improved engagement strategies and broader inclusivity in decision-making processes.
👉 Discover how decentralized governance evolves with real-time analytics and community insights.
Participation Trends in November 2024
November saw a noticeable dip in overall governance participation across both onchain and offchain voting channels. Despite steady proposal activity, voter turnout fell below historical averages, signaling potential external influences and structural engagement gaps.
Voting Participation Rate
The participation rate, defined as the average voting power cast per proposal relative to the total votable supply, declined across both governance layers:
- Offchain participation dropped from 52% in October to 46% in November, a 6-percentage-point decrease.
- Onchain participation also declined, falling from 46% to 43%.
This downward trend suggests reduced community availability or motivation during the reporting period, potentially influenced by external events such as Devcon 2024.
Unique Voters: Engagement Over Time
The number of unique individuals participating in governance offers insight into the breadth of involvement:
- Onchain: Unique voters plummeted by 45.7%, from 10,803 in October to just 5,865 in November. While this is a sharp drop, it remains above September’s low of 3,200 and is closer to the three-month average of 6,800.
- Offchain: In contrast, offchain unique voters rose by 18.1%, increasing from 6,059 to 7,156. Though still below the three-month average of 13,266 (skewed by August’s spike of 27,400), this marks a positive shift compared to the two prior months.
This divergence highlights differing engagement patterns between voting platforms—offchain systems may be more accessible or less time-sensitive than onchain counterparts.
Average Voting Power
Voting power reflects not only turnout but also the concentration of influence:
- Onchain: Average voting power per proposal decreased by 8.82%, from 168.9 million ARB to 154 million ARB.
- Offchain: A smaller decline occurred here, with average voting power dropping by 3.31%, from 145.4 million to 140.9 million.
These reductions suggest either temporary disengagement or strategic reallocation of delegated tokens during the month.
New Voter Onboarding
Introducing new participants is vital for long-term governance health:
- Onchain: Only 528 new voters participated in November—a steep drop from 2,488 in October.
- Offchain: Conversely, offchain saw a strong rebound with 437 new voters, up from just 153 the previous month.
This contrast may indicate that offchain voting remains a more approachable entry point for newcomers.
Potential Factors Behind Participation Decline
The timing of Devcon 2024 in Bangkok likely played a major role in reduced engagement. As many active delegates and contributors attended the global blockchain event, their availability for regular governance duties diminished. This seasonal fluctuation underscores the importance of scheduling considerations and automated reminders to maintain consistent participation.
Voter Dynamics and Delegate Shifts
An analysis of voting power movements among existing and emerging delegates reveals significant shifts in influence and engagement levels.
Existing Voters: Gains and Losses
Among the top 40 voters, notable changes occurred:
Increases in Voting Power
- aretagov.eth: Experienced an extraordinary surge of 2,381.62%, rising from 224,650 ARB to 5,574,962.25 ARB, propelling them into the top 20 delegates. Their current holdings represent approximately 4.16% of the 120 million ARB quorum threshold, significantly amplifying their governance impact.
- chainlinkgod.eth: Increased voting power from 1,936,625.98 ARB to 3,051,658.74 ARB, a gain of 56.77%, reinforcing their position as a key player if they choose active participation.
Decreases in Voting Power
- 24 voters experienced declines totaling -8,434,943.95 ARB.
- Three delegates lost all their ARB holdings.
- Another three saw reductions exceeding 95%, indicating possible divestment or withdrawal from governance involvement.
These drops highlight volatility in delegate commitment and raise concerns about long-term stability in voting representation.
New Potential Delegates
Two new addresses emerged with meaningful delegation:
- 0xidant.eth: Received 120,000 ARB via delegation from a single source despite no prior governance activity.
- 0x8ea94a2e9c7dc84812ced896c318325b0cb40d7b: Self-delegated 94,504 ARB, signaling individual interest in participating moving forward.
These additions suggest continued interest in delegation, though follow-through remains to be seen.
Delegate Status and Engagement Levels
Delegate activity categorization helps assess the health of governance participation:
- Active Delegates (voting >65% of proposals on both chains): Decreased slightly from 76 in October to 75 in November.
- Inactive Delegates (<65% participation on either chain): Fell from 136 to 133, suggesting some re-engagement.
- Ghost Delegates (never voted despite receiving delegation): Rose from 788 to 792, indicating growing numbers of passive delegates.
👉 Explore how emerging delegates shape decentralized decision-making in Layer 2 ecosystems.
While inactive delegate counts improved slightly, the rise in ghost delegates is concerning. It reflects a gap between token delegation and actual participation—highlighting the need for better incentives or accountability mechanisms.
Proposal Outcomes: Community Sentiment and Decision-Making
Six proposals were voted on in November—two onchain, four offchain—with mixed results:
- Five proposals passed with strong support.
- One was rejected: the Minigrant Restitution proposal, which faced overwhelming opposition.
Notably, the Delegate Code of Conduct proposal revealed deep divisions within the community, indicating differing views on governance ethics and accountability.
Despite clear outcomes, all proposals suffered from below-average participation relative to their categories. This persistent under-engagement risks legitimacy and inclusivity in decision-making.
Shifts in Voting Power Distribution
The distribution of voting power continues to influence governance equity:
- Total votable supply increased from 321.19 million ARB to 326.64 million ARB.
- The top 1–10 voters increased their share of voting power by 4.12%, consolidating influence among elite holders.
- The top 11–50 remained stable at 48.6%.
Smaller stakeholders saw declines:
- Top 51–200: Down by 4.02%
- Top 501–1000: Down by 2.94%
This trend toward centralization among top delegates calls for renewed efforts to empower smaller voters and promote decentralized participation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What caused the drop in onchain voter participation in November?
The decline is largely attributed to Devcon 2024, which drew many active delegates and contributors away from regular governance duties during the month.
Why did offchain participation increase while onchain decreased?
Offchain voting platforms are generally more accessible and require less technical interaction, making them easier for part-time or new participants to engage with during busy periods.
Who are the top emerging delegates in ArbitrumDAO?
aretagov.eth stands out with a massive 2,381.62% increase in voting power, now ranking among the top 20 delegates and holding 4.16% of the quorum.
What does “ghost delegate” mean?
A ghost delegate is someone who has received ARB token delegations but has never cast a vote, contributing to low engagement despite formal representation.
How can ArbitrumDAO improve voter turnout?
Strategies include implementing automated reminders, improving user interfaces for voting platforms, introducing educational campaigns, and exploring incentive models for consistent participation.
Is voting power becoming too centralized?
There are signs of increasing concentration—especially among the top 10 voters—highlighting the need for initiatives that encourage broader, more distributed participation.
👉 Learn how decentralized networks maintain balanced governance amid evolving participation trends.
This inaugural Governance Analytics Report sets a benchmark for future evaluations of ArbitrumDAO’s health and inclusivity. By identifying key trends—from declining onchain turnout to rising influence among top delegates—the community gains actionable insights for strengthening its democratic foundations. Continued monitoring and proactive engagement strategies will be essential to ensuring that Arbitrum remains a leader in transparent, decentralized governance.