In the fast-evolving world of cryptocurrency derivatives, understanding the tools at your disposal is crucial for building effective trading strategies. One of the most common points of confusion among traders—especially those new to futures trading—is the distinction between perpetual contracts and delivery contracts. While both allow speculation on price movements without owning the underlying asset, their mechanics, use cases, and risk profiles differ significantly.
This article breaks down the key differences between these two contract types, helping you make informed decisions based on your trading goals, risk tolerance, and market outlook.
What Are Delivery Contracts?
A delivery contract, also known as a futures contract with expiry, is a derivative agreement that obligates two parties to buy or sell a specific amount of cryptocurrency at a predetermined price on a set future date—known as the delivery or settlement date.
Unlike spot trading, delivery contracts allow traders to go long (bet on price increases) or short (bet on price decreases) with leverage. Once the contract reaches its expiration, it is settled—either in cash or through actual delivery of the asset—and positions are automatically closed.
For example, platforms like KuCoin offer BTC Quarterly 0925 and BTC Quarterly 1225 delivery contracts. These expire on September 25 and December 25, 2025, respectively, at 16:00 UTC+8. Traders must close or roll over their positions before this time unless they intend to settle.
👉 Discover how advanced traders use time-based contracts to hedge risk
What Are Perpetual Contracts?
As the name suggests, a perpetual contract has no expiration date. This means traders can hold their positions indefinitely—until they choose to close them or until a margin call triggers liquidation due to insufficient collateral.
Perpetuals were introduced to combine the benefits of traditional futures with the flexibility of continuous trading. They’ve become the most popular form of crypto derivatives because they eliminate the need to constantly roll over expiring contracts.
On major platforms, perpetual contracts are typically available in two settlement forms:
- USDT-margined: Profits and losses denominated in stablecoins.
- Coin-margined (inverse): Settled in the base cryptocurrency (e.g., BTC).
Examples include BTC/USDT Perpetual and ETH/USDT Perpetual, both widely supported across exchanges.
Key Differences Between Perpetual and Delivery Contracts
While both contract types enable leveraged trading, several structural differences impact how traders use them.
1. Expiration and Holding Period
| Feature | Perpetual Contracts | Delivery Contracts |
|---|---|---|
| Expiry Date | None – infinite holding period | Fixed – settles on specified date |
| Position Management | No need to roll over | Requires rolling before expiry |
The absence of an expiry makes perpetuals ideal for traders who want long-term exposure without operational hassle.
2. Maximum Leverage
Leverage directly influences potential returns—and risks.
- Perpetual contracts often support up to 100x leverage, appealing to aggressive day traders and speculators.
- Delivery contracts, by contrast, usually cap leverage at 20x, promoting more conservative, strategic positioning.
Higher leverage increases profit potential but also raises liquidation risk—especially during high volatility.
👉 See how top traders manage high-leverage positions safely
3. Funding Rates
One defining feature of perpetual contracts is the funding rate mechanism. To keep the contract price aligned with the underlying spot market, exchanges periodically charge or pay funding between long and short holders.
Traditionally, funding rates hover around 0.01% to 0.03% every 8 hours (roughly 0.09% daily). However, some platforms have innovated to reduce this cost. For instance, recent updates on certain exchanges have adjusted borrowing rates so that the funding rate differential between base and quote currencies drops to 0%, effectively enabling near-zero funding costs under balanced market conditions.
Delivery contracts do not have funding fees since they settle only at maturity.
Which Contract Type Should You Choose?
Choosing between perpetual and delivery contracts depends on your trading style, objectives, and risk appetite.
Ideal for Perpetual Contracts:
- Day traders seeking high-frequency opportunities
- Speculators using high leverage
- Users wanting uninterrupted exposure without rollover logistics
- Strategies involving tight stop-losses and quick exits
Ideal for Delivery Contracts:
- Hedgers protecting spot holdings over a defined period
- Arbitrageurs exploiting price differences between spot and futures
- Long-term investors aligning trades with macroeconomic events
- Risk-averse traders preferring lower leverage
Many professional traders and institutions use both instruments together. For example, they might hold a spot position backed by a short delivery contract for hedging while running directional bets via perpetuals.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can I hold a delivery contract past its expiration date?
A: No. Delivery contracts are automatically settled at expiry. You must close or roll your position before the settlement time.
Q: Why do perpetual contracts have funding fees?
A: Funding fees help anchor the perpetual contract price to the spot market index, preventing sustained divergence between the two.
Q: Is zero funding rate common across all exchanges?
A: Not universally. Some platforms have optimized their rate models—like adjusting borrowing spreads—to minimize or neutralize funding rates under certain conditions.
Q: Which contract type is better for beginners?
A: Perpetual contracts are generally more beginner-friendly due to their simplicity and lack of expiry management, but caution is needed with high leverage.
Q: Do delivery contracts offer more predictable outcomes?
A: Yes. Because they expire at a known point and lack recurring funding costs, delivery contracts provide clearer risk parameters—ideal for structured strategies.
Q: Can I trade both types on the same platform?
A: Absolutely. Most major crypto derivatives platforms support both perpetual and quarterly delivery contracts in multiple margining options.
Strategic Use Cases
Advanced traders often combine both contract types for sophisticated strategies:
- Calendar Spreads: Take opposing positions in near-term and far-term delivery contracts to profit from time decay differentials.
- Hedging Spot Holdings: Use inverse delivery contracts to lock in value for BTC or ETH holdings without selling.
- Funding Rate Arbitrage: Exploit temporary imbalances in perpetual funding rates across exchanges.
- Event-Based Trading: Use delivery contracts timed around major events (e.g., Fed announcements, halvings) when price targets are expected within a fixed window.
👉 Learn how pros build diversified crypto derivative portfolios
Final Thoughts
Understanding the nuances between perpetual contracts and delivery contracts empowers you to trade smarter—not harder. Whether you're drawn to the endless flexibility of perpetuals or the disciplined structure of time-bound futures, each instrument serves a unique role in your trading arsenal.
As the crypto derivatives market matures, expect further innovations—like adaptive funding models, dynamic leverage caps, and cross-margin efficiencies—that enhance accessibility and performance for all user levels.
Stay tuned for deeper dives into advanced strategies such as spot-futures arbitrage and inter-delivery calendar spreads, where combining these contract types unlocks powerful risk-adjusted returns.
Core Keywords:
- perpetual contract
- delivery contract
- crypto derivatives
- funding rate
- leveraged trading
- futures contract
- contract trading
- BTC futures